Talk:Jane (magazine)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Magazines (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

The fact that this entity is owned by the Walt Disney Company is mentioned in the article and in the article's catigorization. Therefore, the see also section is unnecessary. Gentgeen 05:55, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Sources[edit]

I don't know anything about this subject so I can't help much. I tried to clean some of it (actually, really just the last sentence) and added a reference, but I'm not sure if its a reputable one or not (actually, I'm fairly sure it's not). If someone who knew more about this could try to clean it up and find proper sources (which are really needed here!) that would be great. Crito2161 00:20, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Daria[edit]

I've seen the episode; is there a source to confirm that the episode was designed to make fun of Jane magazine? The episode shows characters criticizing Val for just covering things like lipstick fashions and cute teen boy celebrities, things I don't associate with Jane. --Halloween jack 03:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Subscription Refund[edit]

Anyone looking to get their money back from subscription purposes can call Glamour at 18002747410Ouddy79 22:38, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jane[edit]

This is a terrible magazine.--76.244.160.95 (talk) 01:40, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jane (magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:15, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]